Wilson uses Focal drivers?

Mike

Mike

Audioshark
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
30,481
Location
Sarasota, FL
I found this picture online. Do Wilson speakers use Focal drivers?

14c8eae1a750068282d7a5403d8a607f.jpg


70021a424eaa4c4a8aeb4bf14bccf566.jpg


717eee03d44a6711365ce6b7db24f6ad.jpg
 
Mike said:
I found this picture online. Do Wilson speakers use Focal drivers?

14c8eae1a750068282d7a5403d8a607f.jpg


70021a424eaa4c4a8aeb4bf14bccf566.jpg


717eee03d44a6711365ce6b7db24f6ad.jpg
Click to expand...

Hi Mike,

In the past, Wilson has used Wilson designed, Focal built drivers. The Wilson Convergent Synergy Tweeter is a soft dome used in all Wilson speakers and is not built by Focal. There are 5 Wilson designed versions, each chosen based on application.

No current models have Focal manufactured drivers with the exception of center channels. There are two versions of each, one design updated using the current Convergent Synergy Tweeter and the other using the original tweeter. We continue to build both as there are many Wilson speaker owners who would like to add a matching center channel to their pre CST Tweeter based audio system.

Lastly, Wilson used versions of the Focal based tweeters for decades. Wilson, though 44 years old, maintains parts for all of the speakers we have produced. Even when a manufacturer stops producing, we go out of our way to insure supply. As an example the KEF B139 driver used in the original WAMM has long been out of production. Wilson found a cache of over 100 of them some years ago and bought them all. Keep in mind that this is for a loudspeaker of which only 53 pairs were produced and you can still count on two hands the total of B139 failures in production pairs since the mid 80s. As with KEF B139, we will always have some Focal based Wilson tweeters in house.

Hope this helps.
 
Thanks Bill. I know it's very rare to find a speaker company today that builds its own drivers, I can only think of KEF, Focal, DynAudio, B&W and maybe a few others. I had thought Wilson used drivers, made to their specs from their Scanspeak.
 
Mike said:
Thanks Bill. I know it's very rare to find a speaker company today that builds its own drivers, I can only think of KEF, Focal, DynAudio, B&W and maybe a few others. I had thought Wilson used drivers, made to their specs from their Scanspeak.
Click to expand...


Mike,

Yes , it is very difficult to do both , the cost and expertise needed to do so would be staggering , companies specific to designing and building transducers would be hard to duplicate in a startup ..

BTW , most if not all Ribbon and ESL speaker companies tend to make their own drivers ..


Regards
 
Mike said:
Thanks Bill. I know it's very rare to find a speaker company today that builds its own drivers, I can only think of KEF, Focal, DynAudio, B&W and maybe a few others. I had thought Wilson used drivers, made to their specs from their Scanspeak.
Click to expand...

Building drivers is an entity unto itself. Focal began that way exclusively and KEF was selling drivers in the 60's, Dynaudio in the 70s. What all have in common is the sheer numbers of drivers they build.

The resources to design and build one's owns drivers from scratch at the level Wilson requires could be more expensive than building the the speakers themselves. Anyone who has toured the Wilson factory knows how much goes into building our speakers. When you have manufacturers who are willing to work with you to develop drivers that meet your specific needs, it can be more cost effective than greatly increasing factory space/equipment investment/ and personnel. Plus we would have to develop the construction disciplines for drivers that our chosen manufacturers have developed over decades. That is, to commit to building our own drivers would require an investment such that the same drivers we use now would cost us considerably more. The downside might be the amount of time it takes to design a driver. But even that is minimized when you are an established company with a track record of continuous and logical development.

Were Wilson Audio a $100 million company, it might be a different story. But we are not.
 
A couple of years ago at a small informal Paragon event for Wilson owners, Dave his wife Sheryl and son Daryl shared stories and photos of history of Wilson Audio. During that event he quoted a sales number that surprised me at how low it actually was. Assuming that was his out the door number and not sales at MSRP it wasn't what I would expect. Now I am sure that value has gone up with the introduction of the new WAMM unless those limited edition speakers severely impacted production of the more mainstream offerings.
 
metaphacts said:
Well there you go. I could be in big trouble!
Click to expand...

Not really its public knowledge.

""" Wilson Audio Specialties Inc is a privately held company in Provo, UT and is a Single Location business.
Categorized under Speaker Systems. Our records show it was established in 1973 and incorporated in UT. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of 8358561 and employs a staff of approximately 42.

https://www.manta.com/c/mm2m5mh/wilson-audio-specialties-inc
 
still-one said:
A couple of years ago at a small informal Paragon event for Wilson owners, Dave his wife Sheryl and son Daryl shared stories and photos of history of Wilson Audio. During that event he quoted a sales number that surprised me at how low it actually was. Assuming that was his out the door number and not sales at MSRP it wasn't what I would expect. Now I am sure that value has gone up with the introduction of the new WAMM unless those limited edition speakers severely impacted production of the more mainstream offerings.
Click to expand...

You're right Jim, it would probably surprise many. At the end of the day, it's just a number. That number is irrelevant if the company is private like this one and so many others in this industry. I would guess +/- $10 million. But like I said, it's kind of irrelevant since none of us will ever become investors. The people behind the company is what really counts.

For me, it's more important to look at contingency plans for a company if there is a loss of the founder. Wilson obviously has a plan with Daryl taking over.

This is a topic Joe and I talk about all the time. We've been around a long time and have seen just recently Shindo, Basis, Thiel and many others struggle with succession planning.

We were recently reading, with much relief, about the contingency plans in place at CJ (https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/conrad-johnson-does-anyone-use-this-brand-anymore). But there remains many question marks - especially with companies where the brand is the founder and the brand is named after him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Mike said:
I found this picture online. Do Wilson speakers use Focal drivers?

14c8eae1a750068282d7a5403d8a607f.jpg


70021a424eaa4c4a8aeb4bf14bccf566.jpg


717eee03d44a6711365ce6b7db24f6ad.jpg
Click to expand...
I believe the drivers in your picture are sourced from SB Acoustics. Probably with enhancements specific to Wilson's requirements.

Cheers......
 
MRJAZZ said:
I believe the drivers in your picture are sourced from SB Acoustics. Probably with enhancements specific to Wilson's requirements.

Cheers......
Click to expand...


Well they have the WA logo on the frame so does appear to be a special order item , specs may or maynot be the same thou ...



Regards
 
Mike said:
You're right Jim, it would probably surprise many. At the end of the day, it's just a number. That number is irrelevant if the company is private like this one and so many others in this industry. I would guess +/- $10 million. But like I said, it's kind of irrelevant since none of us will ever become investors. The people behind the company is what really counts.

For me, it's more important to look at contingency plans for a company if their is a loss of the founder. Wilson obviously has a plan with Daryl taking over.

This is a topic Joe and I talk about all the time. We've been around a long time and have seen just recently Shindo, Basis, Thiel and many others struggle with succession planning.

We were recently reading, with much relief, about the contingency plans in place at CJ (https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/conrad-johnson-does-anyone-use-this-brand-anymore). But there remains many question marks - especially with companies where the brand is the founder and the brand is named after him.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

i would guess +/- 5million
 
CPP said:
Not really its public knowledge.

""" Wilson Audio Specialties Inc is a privately held company in Provo, UT and is a Single Location business.
Categorized under Speaker Systems. Our records show it was established in 1973 and incorporated in UT. Current estimates show this company has an annual revenue of 8358561 and employs a staff of approximately 42.

https://www.manta.com/c/mm2m5mh/wilson-audio-specialties-inc
Click to expand...

That one might get in the ballpark through a third party source doesn't change non-disclosure responsibility.
 
manta gathers info from shared data bases and their own researchers, IIRC they were part of InfoUSA. Wilsons revenue data is probably from them providing credit related info and may even be self reported for the same purpose. D&B gathers data in a similar fashion.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top