OK so this is certainly not a verdict on the Rev Ds, just first impressions of the new boards (with Sparkos opamps), which I only picked up a few hours ago.
I am really quite surprised what a noticeable change these have made in my system. I was expecting at most a similar magnitude of change than the one I heard between Burson / Sparkos / SI etc. in the previous boards.
These changes gave the amps different "flavours" (a bit more detail, a bit more bass, a bit sharper or softer...), but you could always tell you these were NC500 amps, you were enhancing the basic sound that come with the LM4562.
My system sounded very accurate, very capable but a tiny bit unexciting with the Rev C opamps. This is no criticism of the amps, the ATC speakers and Tortuga passive preamp on either side are both built for accuracy rather than colour. I enjoyed this setup immensely, especially high quality recordings, and especially recordings with a bit of warmth and mid-bass heft already baked-in. To give two examples from the same era: This Year's Model sounded stunning, Squeezing Out Sparks sounded a bit dull and distant.
The first and biggest change with the Rev D boards is big, intangible sense of "life" in the music. Sorry to not be able to explain that better... everything sounds a bit bigger, more present, more realistic - the best analogy I can think of is moving up to bigger speakers from the same manufacturer.
If I had to dig in a bit further: there is more detail than with the previous Sparkos amps, probably as much as with the SIs. The bass doesn't sound obviously boosted, but it sounds much clearer and more rounded, the mid-bass sounds seems to have warmed-up a bit.
The midrange sounds at least as good as it always did, with vocals and guitars startlingly realistic (playing to the strength of the ATCs).
The overall effect is that my system keeps a lot of great qualities and gained some new ones - that feeling that the music flows, that the system has it's own sense of rhythm. For now, listening has gone from being enjoyable and interesting to being addictive.
I'd be interested to know, if you measured the new boards, would find they are as flat and technically accurate as the last ones were (with SI and LM4562).
It certainly sounds like you can hear just as much detail as you could with those boards, so if any compromise has been made on accuracy, then it has been extremely well judged.
The new boards are not cheap, though I know at this scale I am paying more for engineering time and support than parts+margin. Looking at the cost of the rest of my system I certainly feel they were a worthwhile upgrade in my case, they have really added a dimension that was missing. I would be interested to know if people who have more colourful preamps, speakers etc. than mine feel the same way.