HudsonHawk
New member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2014
- Messages
- 5
- Thread Author
- #1
[TABLE="width: 100%"]
[TR]
[TD]Hey all,
I've got a Mccormack DNA-125 driving my Martin Logan EM ESLs that I really love. Were it not for one big issue, I wouldn't even think about upgrading - and that issue is that it's really big. Like, too big for my rack, meaning it has to sit on top under my TV.
I'm rather fond of the rack - and it doubles as my Plasma TV mount - so I decided recently to look for amps that were either standard component width or less, and the amps that keep popping up are the Wyred and Bel Canto monoblocks, and the Audioshark-beloved Job 225. All of them would fit comfortably in my rack, and seem to be very well regarded.
My only concern is that I regard the McCormack so highly I'm concerned that these amps may not represent a significant upgrade in performance, despite the difference in price. I love it's almost tube-like warmth and musicality, and am a little concerned that with the Class D amps paired with my great but neutral speakers and my tonally similar Class D preamp (the underrated PS Audio GCP), things might get too clinical.
And in the case of the Job 225, I have some concern that it may be too small to drive the Martin Logans (although it has the same rated output as the DNA-125, its performance doesn't scale the same at lower ohmage. Though I'll admit that concern might be misplaced.
Has anyone compared any of these amps to any of the classic Mccormacks and can comment as to what I can expect? Any other amps I should consider that are standard component width or smaller?[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Thanks!
[TR]
[TD]Hey all,
I've got a Mccormack DNA-125 driving my Martin Logan EM ESLs that I really love. Were it not for one big issue, I wouldn't even think about upgrading - and that issue is that it's really big. Like, too big for my rack, meaning it has to sit on top under my TV.
I'm rather fond of the rack - and it doubles as my Plasma TV mount - so I decided recently to look for amps that were either standard component width or less, and the amps that keep popping up are the Wyred and Bel Canto monoblocks, and the Audioshark-beloved Job 225. All of them would fit comfortably in my rack, and seem to be very well regarded.
My only concern is that I regard the McCormack so highly I'm concerned that these amps may not represent a significant upgrade in performance, despite the difference in price. I love it's almost tube-like warmth and musicality, and am a little concerned that with the Class D amps paired with my great but neutral speakers and my tonally similar Class D preamp (the underrated PS Audio GCP), things might get too clinical.
And in the case of the Job 225, I have some concern that it may be too small to drive the Martin Logans (although it has the same rated output as the DNA-125, its performance doesn't scale the same at lower ohmage. Though I'll admit that concern might be misplaced.
Has anyone compared any of these amps to any of the classic Mccormacks and can comment as to what I can expect? Any other amps I should consider that are standard component width or smaller?[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Thanks!