a.wayne
Well-known member
Where is the "review"? I only see lots of measurements.
Some review with only t words, some with only measurements ...........
Where is the "review"? I only see lots of measurements.
Looks like MEPs SINAD worship breddas approve Hypex Nilai500DIY Amplifier Review | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum
Definitely has some juice as it doesn't buckle into 2 ohms. That's some serious squeaky clean drive power vs load. Thought you were a HE/horns guy?
Twill be dead silent with 100+ db sensitivity systems, but 500+ watts?? Bit of overkill IMO. Of course, for non HE, just the ticket.
See yuh soon.
cheers
Yeah I guess we'll never know.No horns here
Cool, nonsense and sense in one sentence. 500+ into 2 ohms for a 250/500 8/4ohm is plenty and good performance, especially for the ridiculously low price. A great many "audiophile$$" amps can't drive 2 ohms and unless the speaker has idiot "injurneering", that much power>load would be more than suffice. Hopefully I didn't insult your mystery speakers.anyway, the HYpex current limits heavily into 2 ohms , but has enuff there to make do
Actually it is the whole picture. His and JA etc who do test, show that the Hypex, Purifi et al are superb, transparent amplification, capable of outperforming human hearing, including yours, in the really, real, non-imaginary world. But that doesn't mean the sight and "knowledge" of them can't/won't lead to audiophile melodrama. So YMMV.Amir tests are skewed to make class D look superior and in some respects the measurements are excellent , but its not the whole picture ..
Well, unless the secret speakers are low sensitivity and/or audiophile injurneering impedance, they will be every bit as transparent as other well designed SS, at any sane level. As I will continue to demo, In public.tempted to give one a go , low heat , low draw when just doing casual listening would work for me no need to run the behemoth for casual listening time ...
Yeah I guess we'll never know.
Cool, nonsense and sense in one sentence. 500+ into 2 ohms for a 250/500 8/4ohm is plenty and good performance, especially for the ridiculously low price. A great many "audiophile$$" amps can't drive 2 ohms and unless the speaker has idiot "injurneering", that much power>load would be more than suffice. Hopefully I didn't insult your mystery speakers.
Actually it is the whole picture. His and JA etc who do test, show that the Hypex, Purifi et al are superb, transparent amplification, capable of outperforming human hearing, including yours, in the really, real, non-imaginary world. But that doesn't mean the sight and "knowledge" of them can't/won't lead to audiophile melodrama. So YMMV.
Well, unless the secret speakers are low sensitivity and/or audiophile injurneering impedance, they will be every bit as transparent as other well designed SS, at any sane level. As I will continue to demo, In public.
Si yuh soon.
cheers,
AJ
Yes, my formal EE education, microwave/radar/satcom/30+ years of varying engineering work, actual products and public demos, puts me at a serious disadvantage to an audio forum expert like yourself Mr Wayne.Explain to me at what level is your understanding AJ, apparently i keep speaking over your head
Without serious cherry picking show me the list of real world 200w/8ohm amps putting out 800 into 2 ohms...and I'll show you a list 1000x bigger that can't. If 500+ into 2 can't drive your mystery speakers, that's purely on you. More than plenty current for the 99.99% of non-pathological engineered speakers. Since you're understandably way too embarrassed to reveal anything about your system, you can't even claim "well my amp can" ;-).200 into 8 is 800 into 2 if no current limiting , so 500+ into two is serious currently limiting
Like your system you're projecting. Well. we'll have to take your word since no one else will ever hear itBTW Audiophile injurneering is usually accompanied with digital eq, xovers , blah blah blah , mega compensation , producing poor timbre/timing, splish splashy sound at best , the deaf and blind can partake , something for everyone ..![]()
I'll admit that your white van speaker business has been around a lot longer than I've been a company.my Audio experience supersedes yours by decades with actual achievements , sales customers and patents not simple high school designs then walk around like a Big wig doing demo’s ..!
200 into 8 is 800 into 2 if no current limiting , so 500+ into two is serious currently limiting , this is basic even for a Campion nutter , this level of limiting ( and heat soak) will rear its ugly head , on anything but a 8 ohm speaker well for those who interest is actually accurate timbre, drive and ultimate sound ...
FWIW, the amp is going to behave as a voltage source to within a couple dB of full power. So at normal listening levels the 2 Ohm thing really isn't a concern. Usually when you run into those 2Ohm impedances with weird phase angles its at a certain frequency and not the entire impedance curve so in practice this will be an issue for only a very few.
FWIW, when the amp is asked to drive a harder load its going to make more distortion too. I don't see the point myself- I've always had the impression that high end audio was about getting away from distortion and closer to the music. There are plenty of easier to drive speakers that sound just as good or better than those that are not easy to drive (and some of that comes simply from the amp making less distortion).
IMO/IME if high end audio reproduction is your goal, your amplifier dollar investment will be best served by a speaker of higher impedance and higher efficiency. If sound pressure is your goal, you have a (IMO) weak 3dB argument for lower impedances, along with which speaker cables become far more critical.
I'll admit that your white van speaker business has been around a lot longer than I've been a company.
Too bad everything about you is always a secret, but that's understandable when its all purely imaginary+blah
Van packed, heading to show my knowledge...in the non-fantasy really real world
I was being absolutely genuine; remonstrations of your word salad (2nd to last sentence of your post above) notwithstanding.With all due respect Ralph, such nonsense , pushing lowest distortion mantra while designing high distortion toob amps, is just more cognitive dissonance than engineering, when does the distortion matter ? I have yet to hear your versions of high Z and efficiency best low Z , low sensitivity setups, (ribbons, ESL's, etc ) most of us are driven by results not meme's and well wishes...
Cmon man at least be genuine with your responses .....
Regards
pushing lowest distortion mantra while designing high distortion toob amps, is just more cognitive dissonance than engineering, when does the distortion matter ? I have yet to hear your versions of high Z and efficiency best low Z , low sensitivity setups, (ribbons, ESL's, etc ) most of us are driven by results not meme's
The mono blocks arrived, and I had to assemble it myself. The Diy assembly was not difficult, with these nilays you don’t have to solder anymore, in a few hours everthing was build the mono blocks where ready for use. What also is new, is the powerbutton on the front and the blocks don’t use many power when they are idle.
Remember: the previous hypex NCore modules where also used by NAD in the c298, which have very positive reviews. I replaced my old NCores by these upgraded Nilays,
I had a decision to make, in build there is a switch module, it means with a jumper you could choose the output power to low gain, mid gain, or high gain. With my Bryston preamp high gain was far too much, I chose low gain.
The result was a big step forward then my old NCores, much more stereo depth, and the lows sounded impressive
These mono blocks perform above my expectations, I am very happy with this improvement.