Disappointing Harbeth 30.1 !

Jerome W

Active member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
1,289
Location
Near Paris, France
Hello folks,
We often write reviews when we fall in love with a product, not when whe happen to dislike it.
So this is an other view of the 30.1.
I borrowed a pair of 30.1 with their Skylan stands at my local dealer to try them in my living room.
Amp is a huge 300XLS single ended integrated from the french company Halgorythme. 2 x 22W. And Halgorythme phono stage.
For the ones who think that a 22W single ended amp cannot drive the 30.1, please note that the power supply of this amp is huge, the amp weighs 55kgs, and it drives perfectly my 40.1 : better than any other amp I tried. The 40.1 are much more difficult to drive than the 30.1.
Sources : Rega P9 with DL103 Expert Stylus Co and AMR DP777 dac.

Listening : from the first note, you can spot this unique mids and treble naturalness and uncanny sound typical of Harbeth. Smooth and full and incredubly realistic with rich and saturated timbres, and incredible transparency and detail retrieval.
The music fills my 50m2 room with ease, with much more presence and authority than the P3ESR.
The bass seemed very impressive at first.
Very tight and powerful. But after 30 minutes and a few tunes from various recordings, it started to bother me. Something was just wrong. It seems that it was always the same musician with the same instrument playing on all recordings.
I felt that a clear bump was present at around 60/70 Hz and was unbalancing the speaker.
Like if the bast boost or a bass loudness was always on, and turned at the maximum volume.
I do not like unbalanced speakers at all. I most often never use my loudness controls on my vintage Mcs, and when I do, it is often to decrease the bass when the sound engineer wanted to impress in this field.

So amazed I was. An "unbalanced" speaker from Harbeth ??? Is this possible ??
So I went on the web and found a similar finding in HighFidelity from Poland :
"the Harbeth M30.1 still had rather pointy, somewhat colored higher bass, sometimes a little dull" and "You can hear now that the tweeter is more opened and that higher bass is slightly "tweaked". I think that’s OK but I wouldn’t go any further".
For the ones who want to read the whole thing : http://highfidelity.pl/@main-334&lang=en

Well, definitely not "ok" for me. This bass boost was causing me fatigue and was making the whole bass transcription very repetitive, and tonally poor.
Of course, I understand that this bass boost can be pleasant for many people. There is a sound for everyone.

As much as I consider the little P3ESR a supremely balanced speaker, as well as the 40.1 that can explore the bass like very few speakers in the world can do, I do see the 30.1 as an "unbalanced" speaker and cannot understand how these can be called "monitors" with a bass that is so much colored. I loved so much the mids and the treble that I am very sad of this issue. Hoping for a 30.2 that will solve this. I cannot believe that Harbeth is not aware of this bass boost.
I guess they made it on purpose, to have the 30.1 "sound like a big speaker".
Well, only big speakers can sound like big speakers. That is summed in the french LaFontaine tale of the frog who wanted to be as big as a beef. One of the key of happiness lays in the acceptation of the essences of the elements.
I listened once to the SHL5 and heard no bass because of a poor acoustics room. But my guess is that the SHL5 is a much more balanced speaker.
 
Very interesting indeed. Personally I can only speak to the 3PSR2 and absolutely love them in a small room.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hey Jerome, thanks for sharing. Do you think it could be your room as in every speaker takes time to get the set-up right with the nature of the room/space?
 
I auditioned the Harbeth 30.1 at a Chicago area dealer being driven by a Rogue RP-5 preamp and Cary solid state power amp. I was shocked at how bad they sounded, with an overpowering bass that I would best describe as plodding. I asked the dealer about it and he said that's their proper sound and that many people like them, definitely not my cup of tea. However after reading Jerome's post and all of the other Harbeth raves I realize that I shouldn't condemn the entire line due to my evaluation of the 30.1 model alone.
 
Jerome - Thanks for sharing your impressions. I've only logged in around 20 minutes of listening time with the 30.1's, and that was in a crappy environment. Suffice to say, I'm in no position to comment as to whether or not your experiences align with the speakers true character. All I know is that I'm sorry that they aren't doin' it for you. The folks that I know absolutely love the 30.1 - and state that it basically sounds like a bigger P3ESR. Perhaps the 30.1's, much like the SLH5+'s, require a bit of effort to fine-tune. Give it some more time, experiment around, listen at the dealer, and see if the results don't change any.
 
http://www.theaudiobeat.com/newport2014/newport2014_harbeth_naim.htm


http://www.audioshark.org/harbeth-loudspeakers-174/harbeth-30-1-outstanding-5041.html

I must be the one with bad hearing. Hmmmmm.


harbeth_naim_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
I love my Super HL5+. They are wonderful in my system. They are sweet and musical. There is no substitute for hearing them in your own system over time.
 
Hi Jerome,

Thanks for your honest feedback. Have you tried repositioning them relative to front and side walls?

Best,
Ken
 
I must say, I do understand both views. This is as I do own both, Harbeths and Magicos. Conceptually they are the opposite ends of the spectrum.

The Magicos are neutral, technical, accurate, power hungry - Alon Wolf makes absolutely sure nothing resonates in the corpus. One review said they play with the accuracy of a nail gun. High resolution top-end, very delicate mids, very detailed bass and all-in-all everything accurate. Those sit in my fairly large family room, driven by powerful Ayre gear, accompanied by a Meitner DAC, an Aurender streaming NAS, WyWires cables, Shunyata power, Stillpoints etc.

The small 3ESR2 Harbeths are built to have a resonating corpus and swing along with the environment. They sit in my vacation home at the seaside in a wood paneled small tower by the sea, powered by a small French boutique amp, Italian cables, playing from a Naim UnitiServe along with a not too cold DAC and some Shunyata gear as well. The whole room is swinging along.

Two very different environments and sets, and I enjoy either one equally. So, what I am trying to say, musicality, tonality, PRaT, detail, authenticity need all to come from somewhere. Hence, IMHO, the total chain and environment are essential; it might be quite hard to reduce it down to one factor or one component.

In general, as I observe, Harbeths are typically quite favorably reviewed within the hi-end community, even though I definitely agree I would not like them or integrate them into all sets or environments.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Hey Jerome, thanks for sharing. Do you think it could be your room as in every speaker takes time to get the set-up right with the nature of the room/space?

Hi Kev,
No. Actually this room sucks bass.
The fact that I got this huge bump is not related to the room. I tried them in my dedicated room and they sounded even worse in the bass.
 
Hi Jerome,

Thanks for your honest feedback. Have you tried repositioning them relative to front and side walls?

Best,
Ken

Hi Ken,

I moved them and also tried them in an other room. This kind of bump in the freq response is more a mountain than a bump. No matter where you place them, you still get it.
 

Joe,

You do not have a bad hearing. I know that the 30.1 got many rave reviews.
Just let me tell you my opinion about reviews :
Most reviews in the magazines are dictated by advertisement. And the fact that only 1 reviewer stated this bass problem on the 30.1, although in very diplomatic ways, is very significant of the poor credit that we should give them.
Now, because of my job, I am very aware of the placebo and suggestion effect on human minds. To me it is clear that we are all influenced positively or negatively by the reviews that we can read, no matter if they come from Stereophile or from our peers.
I am sure that many owners of the 30.1 or other gear are extremely happy when they get the product because their mind has been conditioned to be happy / satisfied by the reading before ordering / hearing the gear at the dealer's shop. And it happens to me too of course.
I am practicing meditation and I am now more aware of what I personally feel.
We always say that we "trust only our ears". But do we really put that in practice ? Or are we under influence ?

I was very excited to hear them. I just think that many people like this permanent "loudness" in the sound of the bass.
Like you, since a few years I have got many various speakers :
Linn Keilidh, Final 1.4 MK2 panels, PMC EB1i, Tannoy Mini Autograph, Wilson WP8's, Klipsch Heresy III, Rega RS10, DeVore Fidelity Super 8, Harbeth 40.1, P3ESR ( 2 pairs ! ).
I presently have 4 different systems in my home.
No speaker ever sounded as "unbalanced" to me as the 30.1. It all depends of what we are after in our systems. I do not crave for neutrality. I prefer musicality. But to some limits. This bass was so much of a caricature to me, that call these speakers "monitors" seem just like a joke.
Definitely, they sounded like the P3 and the 40.1 in the mids and the treble. Just stunning. I was sure to love them : as you know I am a huge Harbeth fan.
The bass sounded like a budget Walt Mart sono speaker TO MY EARS, and I am really sad for that.
 
I know Jerome, I was just kidding but wanted to balance the opinions out. I want someone who is interested in them to go hear them or demo at home. I want them to listen for themselves what the speaker can do in their home. Sometimes people read things on the Internet and take it as gospel. Under the right conditions, I think almost any speaker will work in the right room.

I am sorry you did not like them, I hope others will find out on their own.
 
I know Jerome, I was just kidding but wanted to balance the opinions out. I want someone who is interested in them to go hear them or demo at home. I want them to listen for themselves what the speaker can do in their home. Sometimes people read things on the Internet and take it as gospel. Under the right conditions, I think almost any speaker will work in the right room.

I am sorry you did not like them, I hope others will find out on their own.

Joe...
The only thing I can say here is that you can be assured that the set up of the 30.1 in the two rooms I tried them was very careful.
The 40.1 are EXTREMELY difficult to set up. The 30.1 are just toys compared to the big sisters.
Ask Paul. He never heard them the first time like he is hearing them now.
What I heard in the 30.1 was not a problem
of position in the room/ room acoustics/ gear associated. It was the essence, the real nature of the 30.1. And as I said, although it is a bit tough to me, I accept and understand that some people may like this listening.
 
I take you at your word. I know Paul fell in love again with his 40.1.

You have demonstrated your attention to detail in the past and I know you did not write that review lightly.
 
i think the living voice avatar could be a better match for that tube amp than the harbeth.
 
i think the living voice avatar could be a better match for that tube amp than the harbeth.

My tube amplifier is a unique model. Only one amp like this was made by Cedric Halgrin. I doubt seriously that you ever listened to it unless you are a very close friend of Cédric.
It drives perfectly all the speakers of my house.
Moreover, I got exactly the same issue with the Nagra MSA power amp. Which is probably one of the most "honest" power amp ever made.
 
i think the living voice avatar could be a better match for that tube amp than the harbeth.

As Harbeths tend to be rather full sounding themselves, not sure I would add to it by running them with a tube amp. A matter of personal preference though.

I just took a bit of warmth out of mine by switching from a Wolfson based DAC to an ESS Sabre based one and it did them good.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top