Projectman
Member
- Thread Author
- #1
I received the latest ‘Paul’s Post’ from Paul McGowan, founder of PS Audio. Today’s post talks about the differences in streaming via USB vs Eithernet.
Link to Paul’s post - Please Wait... | Cloudflare
Part of Paul’s post says:
“The problem with USB is pretty simple. It is a hard-wired two-way communication link between a noisy computer and a quiet-demanding DAC.
Ethernet, on the other hand, doesn’t care. You could have the noisest of ancient computers spitting out the data and you can send that signal through multiple switches and routers and miles of cable. It all comes out the same—often regenerated over and over again along the journey.”
I have always believed that expensive Ethernet cables and regenerators were a waste of money, however, I’m sure Paul’s thoughts won’t change the minds of anyone that believes otherwise.
Just thought it was an interesting statement from Paul.
Link to Paul’s post - Please Wait... | Cloudflare
Part of Paul’s post says:
“The problem with USB is pretty simple. It is a hard-wired two-way communication link between a noisy computer and a quiet-demanding DAC.
Ethernet, on the other hand, doesn’t care. You could have the noisest of ancient computers spitting out the data and you can send that signal through multiple switches and routers and miles of cable. It all comes out the same—often regenerated over and over again along the journey.”
I have always believed that expensive Ethernet cables and regenerators were a waste of money, however, I’m sure Paul’s thoughts won’t change the minds of anyone that believes otherwise.
Just thought it was an interesting statement from Paul.
Last edited: