Ref 6 vs Ref 5 SE

MM622

New member
Joined
Jan 26, 2015
Messages
57
[FONT=新細明體] [/FONT]Does anyone compare the sound quality between the Ref 6 and Ref 5 SE side by side? What difference you have found?
[FONT=新細明體] [/FONT]What is your choice if you can get a brand new Ref 6 at USD 10,100 and a brand new Ref 5 SE at USD 8750?
[FONT=新細明體] [/FONT]
 
There is a nice write up in the current issue (MAY2016) of HiFi News about the new 6, and comparisons/differences to the 5se
 
Does anyone compare the sound quality between the Ref 6 and Ref 5 SE side by side? What difference you have found?
What is your choice if you can get a brand new Ref 6 at USD 10,100 and a brand new Ref 5 SE at USD 8750?

Listened to both the REF6 and REF5SE on Aesthetix Atlas Signature monoblocks and Vandersteen Model 7 speakers. In my opinon, the REF6 was significantly better across the board than the REF5SE. The REF6 is on a par with some of the best preamps I've heard. I owned Pass XP-30 pre and currently own Soulution 520 pre, and the REF6 runs neck and neck with them. It punches way above its price point.

Ken
 
If anyone is interested in a mint condition ref 5se, I'm selling one. Pm me if interested. I also have a ref75. Both mint.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk
 
How much would a trade up from a ref 5se to ref 6 cost?

Depends on how much you can get for your Ref 5SE and what you have to pay for the Ref 6. The retail difference is $1K.
 
The last post on this thread is over two years old. Even still, I would like to post a few comments, though late, because I picked up a Ref 6 about a month or two ago. I traded in my very excellent Ref 5SE, which I thought was untouchable. Before sharing comments, it might be helpful to mention that my rig is all ARC, …. Ref 150 SE amp, Ref CD-8 CD player and PH-8 phone pre. I am driving very underappreciated Paradigm S8 (v3) beryllium tweeter speakers. One last point, the tubes in my CD-8 were stale, so I recently replaced them with new tubes.

Ok, to the meat of it. Ref 6 versus Ref 5SE. The Ref 6 surpasses the Ref 5 in pretty much any way you want to compare.

As far as bass/low-end is concerned, I thought the Ref 6 came with an invisible sub-woofer. My speakers are picking up information I never knew existed in my source material. It is not just bloated bass, but really tight. And btw, I started to de-tweak my rig by removing stuff, like my subwoofer. Don't need it. The Ref 6 passes along all the low-end information in a such a detailed and organized fashion that I do not miss the lowest octave, most of which was sonic bloat anyway.

Moving up the sound spectrum, mids and highs are very airy. The soundstage is very convincing. Another attribute that I notice is that complex music, such as orchestral selections, is much less congested. Oftentimes when listening to familiar source material, I think that I picked up a better recorded version. No! It's the same source material, just presented much better than before.

In short, while I love the Ref 5SE, I think the Ref 6 is a step above. I realize that many laud the Ref 10. I can't even imagine how it compares to the Ref 6. How good can great get??

BIF
 
I’m so happy that you love the Ref 6. It was never my cup of tea but love the Ref 10 and get more of what I love in a good preamp. I know I’m in the minority re: the Ref 6. I’m just saying I wasn’t crazy about it but there’s no doubt it’s a superb unit. The Ref 6 is ballsier than previous ARC preamps but I feel the Ref 10 is still has a bigger soundstage, more 3D, open sound that’s a little smoother to my ear. Kind of like a speedboat vs ocean liner.
 
I hear ya Joe. As I said, I can't even imagine how good the Ref 10 sounds.

On a different topic, Joe, do you direct stream music from the internet? I am trying to learn more about that sound media. I read on A'gon that many member speak highly of Tidal. I don't own a DAC, but if I take the plunge, I may swap out my ARC CD-8 for an ARC CD-9. The CD-9 does redbook and has a very good DAC.
 
I do stream a lot. I subscribe to Tidal, Deezer, Pandora and 3-4 more services. I know some look down on it but I can listen to just about anything, anytime. With a great dac and way to feed it, the sound can be awesome. To me, it’s the music that moves me and gets me emotionally involved, not just the quality. I have a bunch of high quality music on a server but feel I get just as much enjoyment streaming.
 
Joe, ... sorry to sound dumb, but when it comes to digital tech, I am a boob. So how do you "feed the DAC"? From what source? A regular PC? And how do you download music? To the PC? And if a PC, how do you connect it to the DAC? USB cables?

Thanks

BIF
 
Don’t feel bad, no dumb questions.

I’m sort of in between DACs right now but you will have a choice of usb, spdif, aes/ebu, and a few others. A staple for me is a Wyred 4 Sound modified Sonos now feeding a Bricasti M1SE via a coaxial spdif. I’m exploring the option of upgrading my DAC with a network connection but that’s another story. When I used a Roon server on my previous DAC, it was fed via a RJ45 network cable.

Your CD-8/CD-9 has either a usb or spdif digital input. You just need to figure out how much you are willing to spend to properly feed it. You can invest in a Lumin U1 or an Aurender type device to stream or use your computer and use a usb to spdif converter. There’s a million ways to get started. Let me check the specs on your ARC player and think of some solutions.
 
Looks like the CD-9 has 4 digital inputs giving you full flexibility.

it will decode the following:
DIGITAL SAMPLE RATES
24 bits @ 44.1kHz to 192kHz, SPDIF, AES/EBU and USB 2.0 HS.


Looks like a great unit. The easiest way to get started is to put a computer via usb into it and subscribe to Tidal. The world is your oyster.
 
If you don't want or need internal storage or a stand-alone DAC the simple solutions are the Auralic Altair or the Lumin D2. Both excellent streamers with built in DAC's. Altair does give you the advantage on having full digital inputs to use it's DAC for other sources which the Lumin doesn't but both are easy to use and sound good. Comparable Aurender unit would be almost $5000.
 
Joe, … is it important that the DAC have internal storage or does one just store downloads on their PC? I checked the ARCDB web site and it does not appear that either the CD-9 or the DAC 8 have internal storage.

So, if all one needs to do is use their trusty PC to connect with the Tidal website and then use a cable to connect the PC to the CD-9 or DAC 8, then I am good to go.

I'm kinda hooked on ARC, so I would prefer to stay all ARC. IMO, there's a lot of synergistic benefits by staying with ARC all around.

Thanks

BIF

P.S. I'm listening to DG Swan Lake redbook CDs on my CD-8. Wow. The Ref 6 makes a big difference.
 
There's no need for internal storage unless you have a decent amount of music. Jack makes great recommendations but all you need is a computer to start and a Tidal subscription with a decent usb cable. You'll get MQA up 96 kHz via your computer. A macintosh will not need drivers. A windows pc might. Anything you can hear on the computer can be played on the stereo.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk
 
There's no need for internal storage unless you have a decent amount of music. Jack makes great recommendations but all you need is a computer to start and a Tidal subscription with a decent usb cable. You'll get MQA up 96 kHz via your computer. A macintosh will not need drivers. A windows pc might. Anything you can hear on the computer can be played on the stereo.

Sent from my SM-N910P using Tapatalk

A very simple approach


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Back
Top