New SFPs in 'da house!

Puma Cat

Puma Cat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 5, 2013
Messages
2,533
Location
East Bay, CA
Been reading in-depth Emile's posts on another forum about the SFPs that he found to be the best-sounding SFPs, and what he recommends for use with the Taiko Extreme. So, today I got in two of 'em in to try out.

I got these from Planet Technology Corp., and they are 1000Base-LX single-mode SFPs from MGB-TLX that support transmission up to 20KM over 9/125 fiber.

MGB-TLX-SFP.jpg


SFP-module_1.jpg


I also got in some Corning LC/LC 9/125 fiber to try out as well vs. the Tripp-Lite LC/LC fiber I'm currently using (which has been working fine).
Corning-LC_LC-cable_1.jpg


Going to start out with the optical transceivers first, and then when I get a chance, I'll install the run of the new Corning fiber. Stay tuned...
 
Last edited:
Well, I replaced the Finisar 850 nM transceivers with the 1310 nM Planet Tech MGB-TLX optical transceivers, and I couldn't get the Lumin P1 to see the music server via my EtherREGEN. It may be that the Lumin, the EtherREGEN or both are not compatible with this specification of optical transceiver, OR...that the Tripp-Lite fiber I was using was not compatible.

So, that experiment was a bust.

Next thing I'll try is using the Corning 9/125 fiber with the Finisar transceivers and see if that works.
 
Okay, update: I just installed the run of Corning Plenum 9/125 fiber; I've got both runs installed next to each other, so I can actually compare different mfrs/specifications of fiber. Both are going to the Finisar 850 nM optical transceivers at this point, and it's working now, compared to using the 1310 nM transceivers with the Tripp-Lite 62.5/125 fiber.

Stay tuned, more experiments to come...
 
Success! After installing the Corning 9/125 fiber I just installed the MGB-TLX 1310 nM optical transceivers, and I'm back up and running! These transceivers sound smoother and sweeter than the Finisar 800nM transceivers when used with the Corning 9/125 fiber, so I suspect there is an transceiver x fiber interaction that is audible.

Sounds really nice: "smoother and sweeter" than the previous set-up, "airier", and the bass has more definition and body as well.

Bottom-line: SFP optical transceivers (and very likely, LC/LC fiber)...sound different. Welcome to high-end audio. Doh! :P
 
Puma Cat said:
Success! After installing the Corning 9/125 fiber I just installed the MGB-TLX 1310 nM optical transceivers, and I'm back up and running! These transceivers sound smoother and sweeter than the Finisar 800nM transceivers when used with the Corning 9/125 fiber, so I suspect there is an transceiver x fiber interaction that is audible.

Sounds really nice: "smoother and sweeter" than the previous set-up, "airier", and the bass has more definition and body as well.

Bottom-line: SFP optical transceivers (and very likely, LC/LC fiber)...sound different. Welcome to high-end audio. Doh! :P
Click to expand...

Thanks for sharing!
 
Puma Cat said:
Bottom-line: SFP optical transceivers (and very likely, LC/LC fiber)...sound different. Welcome to high-end audio. Doh! :P
Click to expand...

Yeah SFPs definitely sound different. At one time I used those Planet Tech SFPs you mentioned. They disappeared better than a few others I tried. I ultimately landed on Finisar FTLF1324P2BTL, which were discontinued a while ago. These vanished even further.

I have not experimented with optical fiber. I’ve used only this which is made from 9/125 Corning optical fiber.
 
Hey Kenny,
I've heard good things about the Finisar FTLX1475D3BCL and the Finisar 1318. The guy that makes the AfterDark master clocks really liked the FTLX1475D3BCL.

When I first got my ER, I was using TP-Link SFPs and having consistency issues with connectivity in ER's SFP cage. If I just touched ER, sometimes it would "disconnect" or connect intermittently, and I'd have drop outs. Alex sent me a GTek SFP transceiver that was much more reliable. Then I got some Finisar 850nM ones, and those clearly sounded better than the GTek, and that's what I was using up until today. They're compatible with 62.5/125 fiber, but apparently, not with 9/125 fiber.

i may get a pair of one or the other, or both, and try 'em. Nice thing is they're both compatible with the Corning 9/125 LC/LC single-mode fiber.

Ha! :D That's the same 9/125 fiber I just got in as well. I ran it alongside the Tripp-Lite I've been using so far.

Cheers, and thanks for the input, my friend. It's helpful. 👍
 
Puma Cat said:
Hey Kenny,
I've heard good things about the Finisar FTLX1475D3BCL and the Finisar 1318. The guy that makes the AfterDark master clocks really liked the FTLX1475D3BCL.
Click to expand...

I have tried only the Finisar 1318 out of those you mentioned. It was awfully close to the Finisar 1324 but I thought the top end made the 1318 less of a good fit, but if I never heard the 1324, I could have lived with the 1318. A pair of 1324s set me back only $19 off eBay so it’s been really easy to sit tight with those.
 
kennyb123 said:
I have tried only the Finisar 1318 out of those you mentioned. It was awfully close to the Finisar 1324 but I thought the top end made the 1318 less of a good fit, but if I never heard the 1324, I could have lived with the 1318. A pair of 1324s set me back only $19 off eBay so it’s been really easy to sit tight with those.
Click to expand...

Thanks, Kenny, very helpful. I'll see if I can snag a pair of the 1324s, you never know, someone may be selling them. In the interim, I may order some of the FTLX1475s and see what those do. I can certainly see how folks might use SFPs to "flavor to taste", which is certainly an interesting "hypothesis" given that "digital" theoretically was "immune" to all this stuff. But, from the perspective of a scientist, all data is useful as it provides a "context for understanding".

Cheers, buddy!
 
Puma Cat said:
I can certainly see how folks might use SFPs to "flavor to taste", which is certainly an interesting "hypothesis" given that "digital" theoretically was "immune" to all this stuff. But, from the perspective of a scientist, all data is useful as it provides a "context for understanding".
Click to expand...

We each have different sensitivities to noise and our systems react differently to noise as well. I had one loaned out my spare 1324s and spare 1318s. He ended up preferring the 1318s and I believe he purchased them from me.

Power consumption does vary amongst SFPs. I believe it was lower power consumption that lead Emile to recommend that Planet Tech SFP at one time. He later recommended the 1324 for that same reason, if I remember correctly.

I had been occasionally powering down my fiber span to see if I could hear differences. I did that by having my opticalModule plugged into a Kasa smart plug. It used to be that I heard a slight improvement with the network powered down. Adding the REF10 and having it provide a reference to the EtherRegen reduced the harm of having the network powered on. Upgrading the REF10 to SE120 either eliminated the difference or gave a slight advantage to having the network powered up. I mentioned that only as it also explains why I’ve held my ground with the 1324s.

The most shocking thing I’ve encountered in this hobby was finding that I could hear the harm done by the upstream FMC and SFP. It certainly blew a hole in my belief that a span of fiber provides perfect isolation.
 
kennyb123 said:
We each have different sensitivities to noise and our systems react differently to noise as well. I had one loaned out my spare 1324s and spare 1318s. He ended up preferring the 1318s and I believe he purchased them from me.

Power consumption does vary amongst SFPs. I believe it was lower power consumption that lead Emile to recommend that Planet Tech SFP at one time. He later recommended the 1324 for that same reason, if I remember correctly.

I had been occasionally powering down my fiber span to see if I could hear differences. I did that by having my opticalModule plugged into a Kasa smart plug. It used to be that I heard a slight improvement with the network powered down. Adding the REF10 and having it provide a reference to the EtherRegen reduced the harm of having the network powered on. Upgrading the REF10 to SE120 either eliminated the difference or gave a slight advantage to having the network powered up. I mentioned that only as it also explains why I’ve held my ground with the 1324s.

The most shocking thing I’ve encountered in this hobby was finding that I could hear the harm done by the upstream FMC and SFP. It certainly blew a hole in my belief that a span of fiber provides perfect isolation.
Click to expand...

Kenny, what are the REF10 and SE120 you're referring to?
 
Some notes on compatibility:

1. If you're using 850nm SFP modules, they are usually multi mode, and therefore require a multi mode fiber. Your yellow fiber is single mode fiber (that goes with 1310nm SFP modules) - it is not supposed to be compatible with multi mode SFP modules.

2. Note that some SFP modules you mentioned are SFP+ 10G, not the SFP 1G that Lumin supports. It is likely that SFP+ modules won't work when plugged into a Lumin P1 / X1 / U2 - I got one user feedback that this indeed does not work. I hope to do test this in the near future.
 
Have you tested OM4 fiber (which uses Corning 50/125 fiber) and/or compared it to OS2 (which uses Corning 9/125)?
 
wklie said:
Some notes on compatibility:

1. If you're using 850nm SFP modules, they are usually multi mode, and therefore require a multi mode fiber. Your yellow fiber is single mode fiber (that goes with 1310nm SFP modules) - it is not supposed to be compatible with multi mode SFP modules.

2. Note that some SFP modules you mentioned are SFP+ 10G, not the SFP 1G that Lumin supports. It is likely that SFP+ modules won't work when plugged into a Lumin P1 / X1 / U2 - I got one user feedback that this indeed does not work. I hope to do test this in the near future.
Click to expand...

Hi Peter,
That's very useful information, thank you, Peter. That would explain why the 1310nM modules didn't work with the orange Tripp-Lite 62.5/125mm fiber then, very likely it's multi-mode fiber.

I'm presently using the yellow Corning 9/126 fiber you recommended with the 1310 nM single-mode SFP modules; it's working well.
 
rbbert said:
Have you tested OM4 fiber (which uses Corning 50/125 fiber) and/or compared it to OS2 (which uses Corning 9/125)?
Click to expand...

Hi Rob,
Are you asking me?

No, I haven't. I've only been using Tripp-Lite 62.5/125 fiber since setting up my optical system back in 2019, and most recently, Finisar FTLF8519P3BNL SFP optical transceivers with that. That had provided the best connectivity and the Finisar tranceivers provided the best audio quality. I had all sorts of connectivity problems using a TP-Link SFP in the EtherREGEN's SFP cage.

I installed the Corning 9/125 single-mode fiber (and appropriate 1310 nM SFPs), based on Peter's recommendation of a fiber specification for use with the P1.
 
I recently entered the sfp world with an Afterdark rosanna diretta optical to usb bridge that uses the diretta network audio protocol asio driver. it made me order some sfp's, some fiber cable and a switch with sfp.

I really like the improvement in sound the afterdark bridge provides. just cleaner and blacker background. lol I'm not good at flowery srajan ebaen type descriptions

I can confirm the finisar 1318pbtl work with this yellow 9/125 single mode cable

"BEYONDTECH LC to LC Fiber Patch Cable Single Mode Duplex - 3m (9.84ft) - 9/125um OS1 LSZH (2 Pack) PureOptics Cable Series" on amazon
 
Read elsewhere that the Planet Tech MGB-T40 single-mode SFPs are quite an improvement over the MGB-TLX SFPs I've been using since transition from multi-mode to single-mode fiber for use with my Lumin P1*.

So....going to run an A/B and see how the new MGB-T40 SFPs pan out...stay tuned.

*-based on Peter Lie's recommendation of using Corning 9/125 LX/LX single-mode fiber with the Lumin P1.
 
OK clueless old non-tech guy here.

Do SFPs plug into the ethernet port of 2 pieces of equipment? Thus allowing you to use fiber between the 2 pieces of equipment?

Thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top