Fiber optic Vs Cat type Ethernet cable

[jadedavid]

Ive read where some have used FMC's to use fiber cable in place of a long run of Cat type cable.
Looking for feedback on this.
I have a 10M Cat 8 to my server and wonder if there would be an improvement by going the fiber optic route.

 

[wklie]

This is preference dependent. You will have to try it to find out whether you like or not.

If you're using Lumin A1, your choice of FMC is limited due to the 100Mbps Ethernet port.

-----------

To do fiber network isolation is to use a pair of fiber media converters (FMC) in a setup like this:

WiFi router or network switch - (LAN cable) - FMC - (fiber) - FMC - (LAN cable) - Lumin

Lumin T2 / D2 / M1 / U1 (MINI): Use a pair of TP-Link MC210CS

Lumin S1 / A1 / T1 / D1 : Use a pair of TP-Link MC110CS (Note: old hardware revisions of MC210CS is not compatible)

Between the pair of FMC you need a single mode SC-SC duplex fiber (note: SC-SC is for a pair of FMC, not for SFP):

3m SC-SC duplex 9/125um Corning ClearCurve single mode bend insensitive fiber... | eBay

The Lumin-side FMC needs to be driven by a LPS, an inexpensive one is:
https://www.jameco.com/webapp/wcs/s...Id=10001&ddkey=http:StoreCatalogDrillDownView

For recent Lumin models with 1000Mbps Ethernet ports (i.e. not Lumin S1 / A1 / T1 / D1), you may also consider using a Cisco unmanaged SFP switch to replace the original switch, with matching SFP module for the Lumin-side FMC. Note that SFP module uses LC connector instead of SC connector.

 

[Puma Cat]

Ive read where some have used FMC's to use fiber cable in place of a long run of Cat type cable.
Looking for feedback on this.
I have a 10M Cat 8 to my server and wonder if there would be an improvement by going the fiber optic route.

Depends on the nature of the device at the end. If you have an EtherREGEN at the "destination" end, then, it won't be an issue as its designed to mitigate the problems of longer runs of copper Ethernet into audio devices, e.g. network bridges or streamers.

If it isn't an EtherREGEN, then, very likely, Yes, you would hear an improvement. The optical cable will remove the effect of RMI and EF and high-source leakage impedance current that copper Ethernet is susceptible to.

If you use an FMC, the most important thing is not to use an FMC with a switch-mode power supply for the FMC at the destination end where you'd be converting back into copper Ethernet, as this will add high-source leakage impedance current back into the of the copper Ethernet going is going into the Ethernet receiver of the destination networked device.

Good clocks, really help, too, so if you don't need a switch at the destination end, minimally you should use a Sonore OpticalModule (OM) as your FMC at the destination end. Better results will be obtained by using OMs at both the source end and the destination ends because the Crystek CCHD-575 clocks in OMs are significantly better than the super el cheapo clocks in generic or consumer FMCs e.g. tp-link, etc (note: these are the exact same clocks in the EtherREGEN because both were designed by the same Ethernet EE, John Swenson). The "cascade" and stack-up of phase noise and jitter from the crap clocks in generic devices e.g. NUCs, computers, routers and generic switches in the network chain is quite audible.

One of the advantages of optical for longer runs is that also that it's easier to route than copper Ethernet, which is why I use it.

 

[wklie]

For the use of EtherREGEN with Lumin, the recommended usage is:

Lumin X1 / T2 / D2 / M1 / U1 (MINI): Switch - side B EtherREGEN side A - unshielded CAT-6 - Lumin

Lumin S1 / A1 / T1 / D1: Switch - side A EtherREGEN side B - unshielded CAT-6 - Lumin

 

[Puma Cat]

For the use of EtherREGEN with Lumin, the recommended usage is:

Lumin T2 / D2 / M1 / U1 (MINI): Switch - side B EtherREGEN side A - unshielded CAT-6 - Lumin

Lumin S1 / A1 / T1 / D1: Switch - side A EtherREGEN side B - unshielded CAT-6 - Lumin

There ya go.

Thanks, Peter.