Esoteric K-01X versus Schiit Audio Yggdrasil

jdandy

New member
Joined
Apr 28, 2015
Messages
3,483
Location
North Central Florida
by J. Dan Daniell


39808247822_99fe9757f6_b.jpg



As I began considering a comparison of the remarkable, albeit humble, Schiit Audio Yggdrasil DAC ($2399.00) against the respected Esoteric K-01X DAC ($20,000.00) the ancient fable of David and Goliath crossed my mind. Just how well could the Yggdrasil stand up against the formidable K-01X? Some audio enthusiasts may consider such a comparison child’s play, a complete waste of time. Others may scoff at the notion a DAC valued at 12% of its opponent would even be considered a worthy contender, sort of like bantam weight meets heavyweight. For others, optimism springs hope the underdog may prevail. With so many positive reviews written on both of these audio components, including my K-01X and Yggdrasil reviews, how these two DAC’s sound when compared to each other generates inescapable curiosity.

After removing the McIntosh MR88 tuner I installed the Yggdrasil DAC in the studio system rack on the shelf above the Esoteric K-01X and Aurender N10 music server. In addition to those three components the sound system consists of a McIntosh C1000C/P solid state preamplifier, MC2301 mono tube power amplifiers, Michell Gyro SE turntable with SME309 tonearm and Ortofon Cadenza Black moving coil cartridge, PurePower 2000 AC regenerator with battery backup, Furutech Flux 50, and Sonus faber Amati Anniversario speakers. All components are powered with Wireworld Silver Electra power cords. All components are connected with Wireworld Silver Eclipse IC’s, Silver Starlight coaxial cables, and the speakers are wired with Wireworld Silver Eclipse speaker cables.

In my estimation approximately 20% of the K-01X’s cost is reflected in its reference level VRDS Neo VMK 3.5-20S transport with dedicated speed controller and independent power supply. Since I won’t be using the K-01X transport, only the DAC, I discounted the K-01X value by that amount, considering this a shootout between a $2399.00 DAC and a $16,000.00 DAC, the Yggdrasil coming in at 15% of the K-01X DAC sans the transport. The price differential is substantial. The challenge comes down to whether the Yggdrasil is in the ballpark with the K-01X, possibly on second base, or conceivably sharing the pitcher’s mound. We shall find out.

For this review both DAC’s were fed digital music files from the Aurender N10 music server. Both DAC’s used coaxial digital connections. The analog outputs of both DAC’s were level matched via the trim control on the C1000C/P preamplifier. Both DACs are fully broken in with 700+ hours on the Yggdrasil and well over 1200 hours on the K-01X. Both DAC’s have been energized for weeks at full operating temperature. Each DAC had its own balanced inputs to the preamplifier so that I could make direct A/B comparisons instantaneously by switching between the two inputs on the remote control.

The Esoteric K-01X DAC features independent power supplies for each channel and uses two independent monaural DAC’s, each channel configured with a parallel array of 8 individual AK4495S delta-sigma convertors. The Yggdrasil DAC features an independent power supply dedicated to the dual monaural channels configured with 4 dual channel multibit Analog Devices AD5791 ladder DAC’s. Each of these DAC’s is quite dissimilar in how they perform digital to analog conversions.


39130866164_b4d70cf9b9_c.jpg



Let’s get down to it. I began this DAC shootout with Steely Dan – Two Against Nature, “Cousin Dupree”, a 24/96 file played from the Aurender N10. The K-01X presented an immaculately clean presentation, bass was solid, voices and harmonies were defined with enough air to clearly identify both voices. Lead guitar sizzled and drums were separated and dynamic in their own space. Quickly switching to the Yggdrasil DAC I discovered a remarkably similar presentation. It was a real aha moment to suddenly realize these two DAC’s stand toe to toe. Bass was a tad more prominent from the Yggdrasil but only by a small extent. Drum dynamics were the equal of the K-01X and so were the voices and harmonies. I sensed that the Yggdrasil was a touch warmer but only by a thin hair. Switching back to the K-01X DAC I experienced a faintly drier, vaguely more analytical presentation that I would never have noticed without a direct A/B comparison to the Yggdrasil. What was immediately evident to me, the Yggdrasil is a serious competitor against the esteemed K-01X.

Playing Joe Bonamassa/Beth Hart – Don’t Explain, “Your Heart Is As Black As Night”, a 16/44.1 music file, this time I began with the Yggdrasil. The opening piano was presented with rich, believable weight. The lower octave notes and midrange chords felt pure. When Joe’s guitar and Beth’s voice appeared I was thoroughly engrossed in the performance. Switching to the K-01X DAC I noticed once again a slightly attenuated bass, not dramatic but discernible. The sensation of a drier unbuttered presentation returned with the K-01X. The sound was completely mesmerizing and fulfilling but there was an infinitesimal pinch of sharpening in the midrange, heard mostly in the timbre of Beth’s voice. Again, I think the Yggdrasil’s presentation has a trace more warmth than the K-01X. The difference between these two DAC’s is subtle. I doubt one could walk into a room with both DAC’s on display and tell me definitively which DAC they were hearing. One thing is for certain, the Yggdrasil has no problem sharing the limelight with the K-01X, no problem at all.

I went on to play Stevie Ray Vaughan – Couldn’t Stand The Weather, “Tin Pan Alley”, a 24/88.2 music file. The K-01X delivered a believable cymbal splash and drum roll as the song opened. Stevie’s guitar floated perfectly over the slow bass and the drummer’s rim strikes were crisp. I switch to the Yggdrasil and replayed this track. The cymbal splash and drum roll were the equal of the K-01X while the bass gained a touch more strength. As the song progressed, the dynamics of the drum strikes, guitar riffs, and Stevie’s voice continued to be fully represented from the Yggdrasil and the K-01X. As I switched back and forth between the two DAC’s it became evident both DAC’s have more similarities than differences. Their sounds are very close to each other, although one can sense the more analytical nature of the K-01X. Again, this is only noticeable during direct comparison.

I played a lot of other music from Bonnie Raitt, Alison Krauss, Beck, Lee Ritenour, Fleetwood Mac, Fiona Joy Hawkins, Enya, and more. Sometimes I switched back and forth between the Yggdrasil and the K-01X DAC’s during the songs, and other times I let the entire song play on one DAC, then replayed it on the other DAC. Neither DAC disappointed me in the slightest. I could listen to either one for hours. In fact, I have. I can say this, David did not slay Goliath, nor did Goliath slay David. Both of these DAC’s are truly astonishing performers and reveal their magic in every respect. In this shootout there is no winner with respect to the quality of the sound, the ability to present completely believable and engaging music performances, and leave a listener unconditionally satisfied. It has been said by a few people that the Yggdrasil sounds bright. I don’t have a clue where this rumor started but I can testify it is not true in my experience while enjoying the Yggdrasil in two different high-end sound systems. Rumors can often be persistent, especially left unchallenged, but that does not make them true. I heard nothing to support that notion.


39808249262_4d07f628ab_c.jpg



The big elephant in the room is the cost difference between the two DAC’s. In my opinion, the performance differences between the Yggdrasil and the K-01X are not the determining factors. Schiit Audio has created an astonishing performer at a price point that makes some think it would be impossible for it to run with the big dogs. This shootout clearly demonstrated to me that is an incorrect assumption. When determining value one needs to consider how a DAC will integrate into their sound system. The Yggdrasil is a PCM only DAC, no DSD playback, no ultra high-end transport, no switchable filters, no external clock provisions, no dimmable blue fluorescent display, no isolation feet, and no exotic CNC milled casework. It is a basic DAC, but oh what a sound it delivers. I knew when I reviewed the Yggdrasil it was a genuine high fidelity performer with an uncanny ability to present music in a way that captures your emotions. When the music ends you feel refreshed, not fatigued. The Esoteric K-01X does not leave a listener wanting for anything, either. It is able to deliver strikingly whole and organic performances that will keep you parked in the sweet spot for hours. It is up to each individual to determine what is necessary to fill their requirements in an audio component. The Esoteric K-01X presents a full pallet of user features and a level of performance beyond reproach. The Schiit Audio Yggdrasil does one thing, and does it extremely well. It converts PCM into wholly believable and engrossing analog sound. Both of these audio components will thrill their owners with high quality audio reproduction.

It comes down to priorities, which particular features are most important to you, what digital file types must you be able to convert, and ultimately what excites you enough about an audio component to plunk down cash? Lucky for all of us there are choices that allow everyone to enjoy premium performance at both ends of the price spectrum without being forced to relinquish the extraordinary sound quality we all crave. At this level it is more about the spices than the main ingredients. Both DAC’s have a flavor that satisfies while offering surprisingly similar sound. The Yggdrasil and the K-01X each deliver leading edge performance that will compliment any sound system. You can’t go wrong with either one of these two DAC’s. So, who wins? You do!
 
What a nice comparison. Well done Dan.

I just wondering if the bright "rumors" of the YIggy can contributed to the older Yiggy with the older USB and Analog boards.

Have you tried the USB yet on the Yiggy to compare the USB to the coaxial digital ? interested in how that sounds
 
Well reading through the 3 specific track comparisons, the common ground was that the Esoteric is a little drier and slightly analytical in comparison. They yggy has slightly more pronounced bass and is a tad warmer.

Personally, even at the same price, I know which I'd choose using your review.
 
As to the Yggy being bright -- the original Yggy w/ Gen 3 USB was absolutely a little bright through its USB input. I experienced that myself. But I always found it to be dead neutral when run through coax input. I think the brightness "rumors" were most commonly persisted by Gen 3 USB users, perhaps aided by a few of those who prefer an overtly warm source.
 
What a nice comparison. Well done Dan.

I just wondering if the bright "rumors" of the YIggy can contributed to the older Yiggy with the older USB and Analog boards.

Have you tried the USB yet on the Yiggy to compare the USB to the coaxial digital ? interested in how that sounds

Chris.......I read comments about the Yggdrasil being bright a couple of times, enough to make me think there are some people perpetuating the notion. My experience with the coaxial and Gen 5 USB inputs, plus the new Analog 2 output boards, has not revealed any unusual brightness. In fact, the frequency spectrum does not sound exaggerated at any place across the audio band.

I will get a USB cable connected between the Aurender N10 and the two DAC's and report my findings compared to the coaxial connections. I have one Wireworld Silver Starlight USB cable and one Wireworld Platinum Starlight USB cable. Since the cables are no identical, as were my two coaxial cables during the review, I was unwilling to attempt a direct A/B comparison. I will use the Platinum Starlight USB cable, but I will have to switch it between the USB inputs on the K-01X and the Yggdrasil. That involves reaching around behind the gear in the rack and hoping to make a quick connection changes while the last playback event is still fresh in my mind. Audio memory is notoriously unreliable. I'll have to be in the mood to go through this exercise so don't hold your breath waiting.
 
Great review! I may have to give one a try. A friend of mine had one of the original Yiggy's and found it bright and not to his liking. He did not like the PS Audio DSD, Metrome Hex and some other DAC I can't remember. He settled in on the Aqua.

I would like to see a review comparing it to the PS Audio.
 
Great review, Dan! It does not surprise me that the Yggy could hold its own against a much more expensive DAC. I experienced the same in another system.
 
I have the original Yggy with analog board 1, and experience no unnatural brightness whatsover either. Yet I am using the AES/EBU connection from CD transport. I have never used the USB input.
 
Dan, what upconversion and digital filter settings are you using in the K-01X? Do you think changing the filter settings like DSD upconversion or 8X SDLY2 may have an effect on the comparison? Thanks.
 
If it played DSD, I’d buy the Schiit without a 2nd thought. I have too large of a DSD and SACD collection to consider it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Dan, what upconversion and digital filter settings are you using in the K-01X? Do you think changing the filter settings like DSD upconversion or 8X SDLY2 may have an effect on the comparison? Thanks.

wklie.......I don't use any upconversion on my K-01X. I prefer the sound of the original files without upconversion and have my K-01X set to ORG. The same for my PCM Filter setting. It is off. In the past I have played with all of the settings. Although I heard some differences I did not find that any of the the settings made a positive improvement to the sound of my system. To answer your specific question, yes, I believe using any of these upconversion and filter settings may impact the sound and may have had some influence on the comparison. I chose to leave the K-01X as I normally listen to it.
 
I am in the studio now and have been for the past three hours. During my first hour this evening I did some additional comparisons of the Yggdrasil and the K-01X. My thoughts expressed in the review have been further confirmed. Both DAC's are a joy to hear. For the past two hours I have listened exclusively to the Yggdrasil through the studio system. Since it will be returned to the living room system tomorrow I wanted an opportunity to enjoy a nice listening session in this sound system. I couldn't be happier with my new Yggdrasil.
 
Time for a blind test Dan?

Howie.......I am together about what I heard during break-in, during my review process, and during the shootout. I feel confident I could identify both DAC's in a blind test. Although the differences in presentation are subtle, they are identifiable.
 
Hi Dan, when you have time will it be possible compare the K-01x playing CD via its transport and Schiit dac with Aurender N10. I know its not apples to apples, but curious what is the outcome.

Also can you tell what made you to go from 4X up conversion and SDLY2 filter (this is what you preferred based on your initial reviews/comment with K-01x) to no filters. I got new K-01x last week and so far braking 4x and SDLY2 since this is what I had before on my esoteric k-05x.

Thank you.
 
Dan - thanks for conducting this comprehensive review and shootout. In all honesty I was expecting the K01x to come out on top. I guess we all form biases to a certain extent based on things like brand name/reputation, price point, and not to mention our own "confirmation bias" when we plunk down $ for a new piece of equipment. This review shatters many of those notions. Kudos to you for remaining completely neutral and stepping into this comparison with an open mind. I can't help but wonder how the Yggdrasil would compare (PCM only) to some of the other "no compromise design" DACs that are getting a ton of buzz right now such as the:

-Chord Dave
-Berkeley Audio Alpha 2
-MSB Reference
-And not to mention my own Mcintosh D1100!
 
Back
Top